1984 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Smart ForFour

To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,292 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Mustang (88 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Because 1984 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Ford Mustang 2006 Smart ForFour
Make Ford Smart
Model Mustang ForFour
Year Released 1984 2006
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 1123 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 88 HP 75 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2510 mm