1984 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,292 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1984 Ford Mustang. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Mustang.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Mustang | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2490 mm |
