1984 Ford Orion vs. 1982 Reliant SE6
To start off, 1984 Ford Orion is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Reliant SE6 (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1984 Ford Orion. (74 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Reliant SE6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Orion.
Because 1982 Reliant SE6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Reliant SE6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Reliant SE6 (233 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Orion. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Reliant SE6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Orion.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Orion | 1982 Reliant SE6 | |
Make | Ford | Reliant |
Model | Orion | SE6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1392 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |