1984 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Mayflower.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Ranger | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1984 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3920 mm |