1984 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Ranger | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 265 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4890 mm |