1984 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Ranger | 1996 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ranger | XK |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4770 mm |