1984 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2002 Skoda Superb is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Skoda Superb (113 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Skoda Superb. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Ranger | 2002 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | Superb |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4810 mm |