1984 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Ranger | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ranger | XJ |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 294 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5090 mm |
