1984 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Ranger | 2006 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2966 cc |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5160 mm |
