1984 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Ranger | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |