1984 Ford Sierra vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1984 Ford Sierra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Sierra (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Sierra weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Sierra (216 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Sierra | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Sierra | 2000 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |