1984 Ford Sierra vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Sierra (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 325 kg more than 1984 Ford Sierra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Sierra (216 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Sierra | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Sierra | Condor |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |