1984 Ford Sierra vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1984 Ford Sierra. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 473 kg more than 1984 Ford Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Sierra. (119 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Sierra | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Sierra | Sable |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1608 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 119 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |