1984 Ford Sierra vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1984 Ford Sierra. (75 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Sierra.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Ford Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Sierra. (123 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Sierra | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | Sierra | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.7 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
