1984 Ford Telstar vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1984 Ford Telstar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Telstar (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Telstar weights approximately 122 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Telstar (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Telstar | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Telstar | Colt |
Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2360 mm |