1984 Ford Telstar vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1984 Ford Telstar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1984 Ford Telstar. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 19 kg more than 1984 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Telstar | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | Telstar | Murena |
Year Released | 1984 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2440 mm |