1984 Ford Tempo vs. 1953 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1984 Ford Tempo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 1953 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Tempo | XK |
Year Released | 1984 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2600 mm |