1984 Ford Tempo vs. 1994 Honda CRX
To start off, 1994 Honda CRX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Honda CRX (125 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Tempo weights approximately 55 kg more than 1994 Honda CRX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Honda CRX. (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Honda CRX.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 1994 Honda CRX | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Tempo | CRX |
Year Released | 1984 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |