1984 Ford Tempo vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Ford Tempo | 1996 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Ford | Lada |
| Model | Tempo | 110 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 71 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2500 mm |
