1984 Ford Tempo vs. 1997 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1997 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki Baleno (99 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Tempo weights approximately 70 kg more than 1997 Suzuki Baleno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki Baleno. (127 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 1997 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Tempo | Baleno |
Year Released | 1984 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |