1984 Ford Tempo vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 1998 Rover 75 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1984 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tempo | 75 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |