1984 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Rover 25
To start off, 2005 Rover 25 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 25 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 25. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 2005 Rover 25 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tempo | 25 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |