1984 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Audi A1
To start off, 2012 Audi A1 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A1 (120 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Ford Tempo weights approximately 65 kg more than 2012 Audi A1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A1 (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 2012 Audi A1 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Tempo | A1 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3954 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1416 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2469 mm |