1984 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7
To start off, 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 (173 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 (270 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Tempo. 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 has automatic transmission and 1984 Ford Tempo has manual transmission. 1984 Ford Tempo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Ford Tempo | 2012 Luxgen Luxgen7 | |
Make | Ford | Luxgen |
Model | Tempo | Luxgen7 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automated manual |