1984 Holden Astra vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Astra would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1984 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1984 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Holden Astra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Astra. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1984 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 1984 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: