1984 Holden Astra vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Astra would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1984 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 508 kg more than 1984 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Holden Astra | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Astra | 3 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1363 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2639 mm |