1984 Holden Camira vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1984 Holden Camira is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 125 kg more than 1984 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Holden Camira | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Holden | Sunbeam |
Model | Camira | Tiger |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2190 mm |