1984 Holden Camira vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1984 Holden Camira is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 83 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1984 Holden Camira.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1972 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Holden Camira | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Camira | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
