1984 Holden Camira vs. 2002 Mazda 6

To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1984 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Holden Camira 2002 Mazda 6
Make Holden Mazda
Model Camira 6
Year Released 1984 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1040 kg 1490 kg
Vehicle Length 4410 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2680 mm