1984 Holden Camira vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 245 kg more than 1984 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Holden Camira | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Camira | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
