1984 Holden Camira vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1984 Holden Camira has manual transmission. 1984 Holden Camira will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Holden Camira | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Camira | Cube |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |