1984 Holden Camira vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Holden Camira (111 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1984 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Holden Camira | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Camira | 2 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2489 mm |