1984 Holden Commodore vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 368 more horse power than 1984 Holden Commodore. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 380 kg more than 1984 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Holden Commodore (266 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1984 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Holden Commodore | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Commodore | Helem |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3296 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 266 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
