1984 Holden Commodore vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1984 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Commodore.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Holden Commodore | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Holden | Proton |
| Model | Commodore | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
