1984 Holden Gemini vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1984 Holden Gemini is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1984 Holden Gemini. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Holden Gemini weights approximately 15 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Holden Gemini | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Gemini | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2210 mm |