1984 Honda HP-X vs. 2002 Rover 25
To start off, 2002 Rover 25 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Honda HP-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Honda HP-X would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Honda HP-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Honda HP-X weights approximately 135 kg more than 2002 Rover 25.
Because 1984 Honda HP-X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Honda HP-X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Honda HP-X has automatic transmission and 2002 Rover 25 has manual transmission. 2002 Rover 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Honda HP-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Honda HP-X | 2002 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Honda | Rover |
| Model | HP-X | 25 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1020 kg |
