1984 Honda HP-X vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Honda HP-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Honda HP-X would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Honda HP-X is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Honda HP-X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Honda HP-X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Honda HP-X | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Honda | Audi |
Model | HP-X | A3 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |