1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 1967 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1984 Jaguar XJR is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jaguar XJR | 1967 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XJR | 1300 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 53 L |