1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan AA-X weights approximately 354 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Jaguar XJR | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | XJR | AA-X |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |
