1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo weights approximately 264 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Jaguar XJR | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XJR | Dingo |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2450 mm |
