1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 494 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jaguar XJR | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | C70 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |