1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Jaguar XJR | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJR | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1311 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |
