1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 159 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Jaguar XJR | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | XJR | Colt |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 47 L |
