1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jaguar XJR | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJR | C30 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 70 L |