1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 908 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | Jaguar | Aston Martin |
Model | XJR | DB9 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1814 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4712 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |