1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Audi RS5
To start off, 2012 Audi RS5 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi RS5 weights approximately 844 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2012 Audi RS5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Audi RS5 | |
Make | Jaguar | Audi |
Model | XJR | RS5 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 354 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4625 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 63 L |