1984 Jaguar XJR vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 799 kg more than 1984 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Jaguar XJR | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | XJR | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2858 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 71 L |
