1984 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1984 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Jeep CJ7 (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Jeep CJ7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Jeep CJ7 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jeep CJ7 | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ7 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2250 mm |