1984 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 67 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3.
Because 1984 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Jeep CJ7 | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ7 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1223 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |
