1984 Jeep CJ7 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (200 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1984 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 69 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1984 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Jeep CJ7 (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (85 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1984 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jeep CJ7 | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
Model | CJ7 | Polo |
Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1221 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2470 mm |